“When Empathy Bites Back: Cautionary Tales from Neuroscience for Capita” by Sheri Lynn …

Document Type Article Publication Date 11-2016 Keywords Capital punishment, Death penalty Disciplines Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Law and Psychology | Neurosciences Abstract The neuroscience of empathy provides one more reason to believe that the decision to sentence another human being to death is inevitably an arbitrary one, and one that cannot be divorced from either race or caprice. While we can tinker with aspects of capital trials that exacerbate caprice and discrimination stemming from empathy, we cannot alter basic neural responses to the pain of others and therefore cannot rationalize (in either sense of the word) empathic responses. Recommended Citation Sheri Lynn Johnson, et al., “When Empathy Bites Back: Cautionary Tales from Neuroscience for Capital Sentencing,” 85 Fordham Law Review (2016)


Link to Full Article: “When Empathy Bites Back: Cautionary Tales from Neuroscience for Capita” by Sheri Lynn …

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Join Our Newsletter

Sign up to our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates about homeAI.info and the Informed.AI Network of AI related websites which includes Events.AI, Neurons.AI, Awards.AI, and Vocation.AI

You have Successfully Subscribed!